<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Netbook success]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1445&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2010-05-18T17:01:58Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=1445</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Netbook success]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12248#p12248"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Paul, </p><p>I&#039;m not that knowledgeable, and perhaps someone else can chime in, but my understanding is that the performance index measures how well a computer system is able to handle the demands of Pianoteq, which is processor intensive. </p><p>The higher the performance index, the better. For instance, my Core 2 Duo machine gets a performance index of 38-40. I can run it at a higher bitrate and at lower latency than with a netbook, where compromises need to be made.</p><p>That Pianoteq can run AT ALL on a netbook, and be stable, I find amazing.</p><p>Michael</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Michael H]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1163</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-05-18T17:01:58Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12248#p12248</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Netbook success]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12230#p12230"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Michael H wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>....I get a solid performance index of 9, and sometimes 10</p></blockquote></div><p>Could somebody please explain exactly what this value represents?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Paul]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=24</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-05-18T08:29:30Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12230#p12230</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Netbook success]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12218#p12218"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I recently picked up an Asus 1005HA netbook, and I&#039;m happy to report that it runs Pianoteq well, given the limitations of the current Atom processors. This netbook has the N270 processor which runs at 1.6Ghz. <br />I get a solid performance index of 9, and sometimes 10, with VERY occasional glitches at 96Khz and 256 samples, with an internal sample rate of 24Khz and a latency of 2.7 ms. It&#039;s set to 48 voices and I expect more wouldn&#039;t be a problem, but I don&#039;t need them. The processor hit hasn&#039;t gotten past 57%.</p><p>The only performance issue I&#039;ve seen is that moving a volume/cc7 slider while playing notes produces crackling and distortion. Bumping things up to 512 samples and 5.3 ms latency cures that. Some may find that much latency objectionable, I&#039;m undecided.</p><p>If anyone can refer me to some Windows 7 performance tweaks I&#039;d be grateful. Black Viper has a site for windows services tweaks that I&#039;m checking out too.</p><p>Now that I&#039;ve got one of these netbooks I can see the appeal- it&#039;s a lot of fun, and amazingly it runs Pianoteq! In fact, I&#039;ve got it running Cantabile, Pianoteq and NI B4 at once, and so far so good <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p><br /><p>Michael</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Michael H]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1163</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-05-17T23:27:15Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12218#p12218</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
