<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - New laptop: ideal spec?]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1433&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2010-07-11T09:34:50Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=1433</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New laptop: ideal spec?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=13074#p13074"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>In my case:<br />Dell Note Studio 1535<br />windows vista home premium<br />Intel Core2 Duo 2.10GHz<br />4GB HDD320GB<br />There is no strees to use PianoTeq.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[imyfujita]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1436</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-07-11T09:34:50Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=13074#p13074</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New laptop: ideal spec?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=13069#p13069"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Athlon single core 2.21 ghz / Mackie onyx 400F here on windows 7. I run pianoteq at 128 buffer latency fine, but 256 is good enough on my system. Even 64 works, but it&#039;s really no point. </p><p>Keep in mind that differend soundcards and even drivers can give varying latency. For example; the latency on my system is much worse on the stock ASIO or WDM (through Sonar) drivers than ASIO4ALL for some reason.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[stramTuplik]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1470</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-07-10T21:06:42Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=13069#p13069</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New laptop: ideal spec?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=13066#p13066"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Ah, my Indigo is the PCMCIA one, so maybe it is louder. I have the card close to max, and Pianoteq at 0db. At this level, other sources such as heavily compressed peak-level audio can make me leap out of my chair!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[mooks]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=677</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-07-10T19:25:03Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=13066#p13066</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New laptop: ideal spec?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=13065#p13065"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>mooks wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I have the volume close to max, but I think my Echo Indigo + HD580s are loud enough. Look after your ears!</p></blockquote></div><br /><p>(LOL) the pianos can get loud enough when I have the pianoteq volume +6-+8 with the echo indigo on max, but then the limiter has to be engaged. At that volume, though,&nbsp; the limiter really kicks in and kills a lot of the dynamics and resonance.&nbsp; I really like all of the pianos with the limiter completely off. But who knows, maybe 10+ years of ipod use is starting to catch up with me. <i class="far fa-smile-wink smiley"></i></p><p>BTW, I&#039;m using the the echo indigo djx (express card version).&nbsp; I seem to remember that the original pcmcia version, which I used to have, was louder?</p><p>Haven&#039;t tried the AKG 701. I&#039;m sure that is properly amped these are up there with the Senns. Once I get a headphone amp, I&#039;ll check to see if that improves the K240 MKII.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[bebop603]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1381</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-07-10T18:46:46Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=13065#p13065</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New laptop: ideal spec?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=13056#p13056"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I have the volume close to max, but I think my Echo Indigo + HD580s are loud enough. Look after your ears!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[mooks]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=677</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-07-10T09:40:30Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=13056#p13056</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New laptop: ideal spec?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=13055#p13055"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>bebop603 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>To my ears, the AKG just can&#039;t capture the timbre of the instruments with as much detail or realism.</p></blockquote></div><p>Did you try the AKG <strong>K-701</strong> ( more expensive indeed)?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[iaoranaemaeva]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=405</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-07-10T09:23:34Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=13055#p13055</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New laptop: ideal spec?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=13048#p13048"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Update:</p><p>I bought the AKG K240 MKII headphones, and after burning them in for a few days, I tried them with my setup.&nbsp; The Echo Indigo doesn&#039;t drive them any louder than the Senn HD580! About the same volume.</p><p>So looks like it&#039;s headphone amp time. My choice: <br /><a href="http://headphonesamplifier.com/little-dot-mk-iii-headphone-amplifierpre-amp/">http://headphonesamplifier.com/little-d...erpre-amp/</a></p><p>Getting a little off-topic here, but my subjective impression of the AKG K240 vs the Senn HD580:</p><p>The K240 sounds clear with good base extension.<br />But the HD580 is definitely in a different league: Warmer, more detailed, and more musical sound.&nbsp; The C3 and M3 really sound authentic and beautiful on the Senns.&nbsp; To my ears, the AKG just can&#039;t capture the timbre of the instruments with as much detail or realism.</p><p>IMO, the K1 suffers a little bit with the Senns for some reason.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[bebop603]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1381</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-07-10T00:24:49Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=13048#p13048</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New laptop: ideal spec?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12935#p12935"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to report back on the Echo Indigo/Sennheiser 580 combo.</p><p>It&#039;s possible to get enough volume, but I&#039;m finding that the Limiter kicks in so much at +8db volume that the pianos sometimes sound kind of muted. So I&#039;d recommend lower impedance phones using the Echo Indigo (eg AKG K240 MKII @55ohms) rather than the 300ohm impedance Senn 580/600, unless you add an additional headphone amp. </p><p>The sound from the Echo/Indigo + Senn 580 is amazing, though. Just need a little more power.</p><p>All the pianos sound better to me with the limiter turned off, especially the K1.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[bebop603]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1381</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-07-02T15:04:04Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12935#p12935</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New laptop: ideal spec?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12820#p12820"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Nice system! I&#039;m getting performance index of 45 on the core i3 350 dell studio 14 with Echo Indigo djx expresscard.&nbsp; &nbsp;The echo indigo has *just* enough output for good volume on my Senn 580&#039;s, though I have to crank everything up to max and put the Pianoteq volume on +8 db.</p><p>Still playing around with the power settings--I&#039;m using 96khz with 128 sample buffer.&nbsp; One thing new in Windows 7(to me) is the cpu throttling.&nbsp; Default minimum CPU setting for the high performance mode is 5%--so the clock will throttle up and down, and so far I get the best performance with 50% minimum clock. I get a performance index of 36 with that setting.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[bebop603]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1381</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-06-27T17:50:19Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12820#p12820</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New laptop: ideal spec?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12809#p12809"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I just got my new Dell Studio 1558, with an i5 430.(4 GB ram ,64 bit win7)<br />It&#039;s a real beast - it eats two pianoteq instances + &quot;my drumset&quot; + compression + reverb + audio track with plenty of room for more ...<br />I wanted something with an i5, and with a firewire interface, so there were not many choices out there.</p><p>I can verify the &quot;48&quot; index in pianoteq, when running the &quot;high performance&quot; power scheme.<br />Though playing standalone, you don&#039;t really need the &quot;high performance&quot; scheme, going easier on the battery, getting an index around 25.</p><p>P.S and I love the red finish :-)</p><p>-- Eran</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[etalmor]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=42</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-06-27T13:54:58Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12809#p12809</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New laptop: ideal spec?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12534#p12534"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>- Sony Vaio 13&quot;3 / core i5 M540 @ 2.53 Ghz / 6 Go DDR3 Ram / 128 Go SSD <br />running win 7 64 (soon will run XP 64 SP3)<br />- Hosted in Live 8 with soft VST plugin chain (preamp / EQ / Reverb) and with no other midi vst track and no audio tracks running, just PTQ<br />- Soundcard : Presonus Firebox or RME Fireface UC : 256 samples (&lt; 4 ms)<br />- Midi keyboard is Roland RD700GX with Medium keyboard response</p><p>For a live instrumental playing (with harp, guitar and voices) sometimes using very long sustained notes with heavy polyphony</p><p>Everything is stable and fine. </p><p>Using the Sound Recording Section, it&#039;s very hard to tweak the phase microphones&nbsp; configuration : at first the result truly depends on your monitoring set quality (for me headphones are not the best to do this). The sound of your piano can radically change even with a subtle different mic placement changing. But this section is definitely amazing for those who like tweaking and testing the sound at millimeters.</p><p>Depending on soundcard settings / performance, the ability to support full polyphony play works from 128 to 256 simultaneous notes.</p><p>I think that things depend on:</p><p>- not just your processor computer performance<br />- but also the performance of your soundcard<br />- how you tweak the Design Section of PTQ : if you set a too longer impedance / string length / sympathetic resonance then your CPU will be dramatically in charge, particularly if you have a heavy foot pedal sustain use</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[darkunst]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1417</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-06-02T11:44:09Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12534#p12534</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New laptop: ideal spec?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12208#p12208"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Of course, now I am realising all the hassle relating to Windows 7 compatibility issues that will come with a new machine. PTQ will be OK but my Cakewalk sequencer for one won&#039;t be and will need upgrading. More expense...</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Paul]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=24</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-05-17T15:55:53Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12208#p12208</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New laptop: ideal spec?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12202#p12202"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Ciel Rose wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Also be careful with battery cells time. Some HP computers are pretty powerful but have short battery life (1 hour, 3 hours). MacbookPro has 7 to 10 hours (in the new models). <br />Sometimes a little extra saves a lot of hassles.</p></blockquote></div><p>True enough but I rarely use without power so not my top priority. Thanks anyway.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Paul]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=24</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-05-17T07:49:42Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12202#p12202</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New laptop: ideal spec?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12194#p12194"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Also be careful with battery cells time. Some HP computers are pretty powerful but have short battery life (1 hour, 3 hours). MacbookPro has 7 to 10 hours (in the new models). <br />Sometimes a little extra saves a lot of hassles.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Ciel Rose]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=756</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-05-17T00:47:07Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12194#p12194</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New laptop: ideal spec?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12182#p12182"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all the replies - plenty to work on. I too have an optional Echo Indigo sound card that needs a 54mm cardbus slot as does my Firewire card that I use for a&nbsp; different hobby - video editing.</p><p>Cardbus slots, especially 54mm, seem to be becoming a thing of the past - HP have the best choice of models with those, some even with dedicated firewire.</p><p>So it&#039;s a balancing act as usual but many of the models with i5 CPUs may be a bit pricey. </p><p>On with the search...</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Paul]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=24</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-05-15T19:01:49Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12182#p12182</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
