<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=1377</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in New feature suggestion:  Metering.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 06:33:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11750#p11750</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>hum... this would mostly use the graphics ressources, I doubt it would use much CPU power. Anyway, it should be a separate windows one could freely open or close.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Luc Henrion)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 06:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11750#p11750</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11749#p11749</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I probably just misunderstood the original post, and I was thinking in terms of just 2-3 mics. But yes, with several mics, the load could get heavy.&nbsp; I&#039;d rather the resources go towards the sound, too.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Jake Johnson)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 06:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11749#p11749</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11746#p11746</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Jake Johnson wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I only do stereo. I wasn&#039;t thinking in terms of output, really. I was thinking more along the lines of the relative amplitude of the sound coming into each mic, and thus how much each contributes to the over-all sound. In other words, we could see how a mic near the harp contributed alongside how much a mic behind the player contributed.</p><p>Of course, we can set the levels now, but we don&#039;t see the actual amplitudes.</p></blockquote></div><p>Now that you&#039;ve elaborated Jake, I concede that it would be useful.</p><p>My only concern would be how much CPU power would be diverted to less essential tasks than making music.</p><p>Glenn</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Glenn NK)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 03:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11746#p11746</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11743#p11743</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I only do stereo. I wasn&#039;t thinking in terms of output, really. I was thinking more along the lines of the relative amplitude of the sound coming into each mic, and thus how much each contributes to the over-all sound. In other words, we could see how a mic near the harp contributed alongside how much a mic behind the player contributed.</p><p>Of course, we can set the levels now, but we don&#039;t see the actual amplitudes.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Jake Johnson)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11743#p11743</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11731#p11731</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Jake Johnson wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>A meter on each mic would give more valuable information, wouldn&#039;t it--letting the user see level changes as the mics were moved?</p></blockquote></div><p>The question is - is a meter on each mic necessary?&nbsp; I&#039;m recording in stereo (two channels) and often only blow one channel, so two would suffice.</p><p>How often do you record to five channels?</p><p>I don&#039;t often render with Pianoteq because I want to use the reverb on my soundcard rather than the elementary reverb on PT.</p><p>Glenn</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Glenn NK)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11731#p11731</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11730#p11730</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Glenn NK wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Jake:</p><p>That would be a VU for each channel wouldn&#039;t it?</p><p>It might be a bit messy for five mics.</p><p>Glenn</p></blockquote></div><p>A meter on each mic would give more valuable information, wouldn&#039;t it--letting the user see level changes as the mics were moved?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Jake Johnson)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11730#p11730</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11729#p11729</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Glenn NK wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>That would be a VU for each channel wouldn&#039;t it?</p><p>It might be a bit messy for five mics.</p></blockquote></div><p>But absolutely necessary, IMHumO -- look at Melda Production&#039;s multiband plug-ins for an effective treatment:&nbsp; each band (up to 6!) is granted its own pair of <span class="bbu">stereo</span> meters, and I think the look is absolutely excellent.&nbsp; (Plus, the windows are scalable, so if the ol&#039; eyes are crapping out, then I just widen the window to get a better perspective!)</p><p>(I&#039;m all in favour of your detachable screen idea, too!)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (dhalfen)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11729#p11729</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11728#p11728</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Jake:</p><p>That would be a VU for each channel wouldn&#039;t it?</p><p>It might be a bit messy for five mics.</p><p>Glenn</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Glenn NK)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 02:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11728#p11728</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11718#p11718</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>1+ for meters on each mic.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Jake Johnson)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11718#p11718</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11566#p11566</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Look you guys, I&#039;ve been whining for a two channel extended VU meter for quite a while now.</p><p>Sure, I can load up my wave editor and watch the VU there (or my soundcard), but when I&#039;m rendering a midi to wave these are useless.</p><p>The VU could be a detachable screen - loaded or not as our option.</p><p>Glenn</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Glenn NK)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11566#p11566</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11550#p11550</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>EvilDragon wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I guess this could be in Pianoteq 4. I&#039;m sure to have extensive discussions with Modartt about improving their GUI for that version <i class="far fa-smile-wink smiley"></i></p></blockquote></div><p>That&#039;s what I&#039;m thinking, too -- crack that whip!!!&nbsp; (ouch...)</p><p>;^)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (dhalfen)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11550#p11550</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11532#p11532</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I guess this could be in Pianoteq 4. I&#039;m sure to have extensive discussions with Modartt about improving their GUI for that version <i class="far fa-smile-wink smiley"></i></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (EvilDragon)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11532#p11532</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11531#p11531</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>very good idea(s)!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Luc Henrion)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11531#p11531</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11520#p11520</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve never really thought about this because I tend to use Pianoteq within a host, but for standalone in particular, I feel that the program could <span class="bbu">really</span> benefit from a better metering system.&nbsp; (I&#039;ve been using a fair amount of visual analysis lately.)&nbsp; The single VU meter in the &quot;Output&quot; section is woefully inadequate and does nothing to give an idea of the stereo (or surround) image.</p><p>I propose one general improvement:</p><p>In the &quot;Sound Recording&quot; room, in the <span class="bbu">dead space</span> under the &quot;Level&quot; &amp; &quot;Delay&quot; compensation buttons (ooooo, that text for &quot;compensation&quot; is especially small, I&#039;m a-goin&#039; blind, guys...), why not install a <strong><span class="bbu">vertical</span></strong> VU meter for each microphone?</p><p>This &quot;little&quot; improvement would be quite noticeable (and appreciated).</p><p>(Any way to measure phase/delay here, too?&nbsp; Though I&#039;ll be happy with just volume!!!)</p><p>A secondary, lesser (but possibly desired) improvement:&nbsp; in the &quot;Output&quot; section, add a second VU meter (read:&nbsp; squeeze that sucker in there!!!) below the current meter.&nbsp; In mono, they would both read the same data (or one meter could grey out?), but they would accurately reflect differences in stereo mode.&nbsp; (But I&#039;m definitely more interested in seeing meters in for &quot;Sound Recording!!!&quot;)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (dhalfen)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11520#p11520</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
