<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1377&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2010-04-22T06:33:23Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=1377</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11750#p11750"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>hum... this would mostly use the graphics ressources, I doubt it would use much CPU power. Anyway, it should be a separate windows one could freely open or close.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Luc Henrion]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=6</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-04-22T06:33:23Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11750#p11750</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11749#p11749"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I probably just misunderstood the original post, and I was thinking in terms of just 2-3 mics. But yes, with several mics, the load could get heavy.&nbsp; I&#039;d rather the resources go towards the sound, too.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Jake Johnson]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=11</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-04-22T06:12:19Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11749#p11749</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11746#p11746"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Jake Johnson wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I only do stereo. I wasn&#039;t thinking in terms of output, really. I was thinking more along the lines of the relative amplitude of the sound coming into each mic, and thus how much each contributes to the over-all sound. In other words, we could see how a mic near the harp contributed alongside how much a mic behind the player contributed.</p><p>Of course, we can set the levels now, but we don&#039;t see the actual amplitudes.</p></blockquote></div><p>Now that you&#039;ve elaborated Jake, I concede that it would be useful.</p><p>My only concern would be how much CPU power would be diverted to less essential tasks than making music.</p><p>Glenn</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Glenn NK]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=750</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-04-22T03:06:55Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11746#p11746</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11743#p11743"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I only do stereo. I wasn&#039;t thinking in terms of output, really. I was thinking more along the lines of the relative amplitude of the sound coming into each mic, and thus how much each contributes to the over-all sound. In other words, we could see how a mic near the harp contributed alongside how much a mic behind the player contributed.</p><p>Of course, we can set the levels now, but we don&#039;t see the actual amplitudes.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Jake Johnson]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=11</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-04-21T23:07:49Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11743#p11743</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11731#p11731"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Jake Johnson wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>A meter on each mic would give more valuable information, wouldn&#039;t it--letting the user see level changes as the mics were moved?</p></blockquote></div><p>The question is - is a meter on each mic necessary?&nbsp; I&#039;m recording in stereo (two channels) and often only blow one channel, so two would suffice.</p><p>How often do you record to five channels?</p><p>I don&#039;t often render with Pianoteq because I want to use the reverb on my soundcard rather than the elementary reverb on PT.</p><p>Glenn</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Glenn NK]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=750</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-04-21T05:17:04Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11731#p11731</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11730#p11730"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Glenn NK wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Jake:</p><p>That would be a VU for each channel wouldn&#039;t it?</p><p>It might be a bit messy for five mics.</p><p>Glenn</p></blockquote></div><p>A meter on each mic would give more valuable information, wouldn&#039;t it--letting the user see level changes as the mics were moved?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Jake Johnson]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=11</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-04-21T04:21:37Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11730#p11730</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11729#p11729"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Glenn NK wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>That would be a VU for each channel wouldn&#039;t it?</p><p>It might be a bit messy for five mics.</p></blockquote></div><p>But absolutely necessary, IMHumO -- look at Melda Production&#039;s multiband plug-ins for an effective treatment:&nbsp; each band (up to 6!) is granted its own pair of <span class="bbu">stereo</span> meters, and I think the look is absolutely excellent.&nbsp; (Plus, the windows are scalable, so if the ol&#039; eyes are crapping out, then I just widen the window to get a better perspective!)</p><p>(I&#039;m all in favour of your detachable screen idea, too!)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dhalfen]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=536</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-04-21T03:49:22Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11729#p11729</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11728#p11728"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Jake:</p><p>That would be a VU for each channel wouldn&#039;t it?</p><p>It might be a bit messy for five mics.</p><p>Glenn</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Glenn NK]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=750</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-04-21T02:22:05Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11728#p11728</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11718#p11718"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>1+ for meters on each mic.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Jake Johnson]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=11</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-04-20T15:46:00Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11718#p11718</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11566#p11566"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Look you guys, I&#039;ve been whining for a two channel extended VU meter for quite a while now.</p><p>Sure, I can load up my wave editor and watch the VU there (or my soundcard), but when I&#039;m rendering a midi to wave these are useless.</p><p>The VU could be a detachable screen - loaded or not as our option.</p><p>Glenn</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Glenn NK]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=750</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-04-16T20:00:35Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11566#p11566</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11550#p11550"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>EvilDragon wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I guess this could be in Pianoteq 4. I&#039;m sure to have extensive discussions with Modartt about improving their GUI for that version <i class="far fa-smile-wink smiley"></i></p></blockquote></div><p>That&#039;s what I&#039;m thinking, too -- crack that whip!!!&nbsp; (ouch...)</p><p>;^)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dhalfen]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=536</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-04-16T18:41:12Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11550#p11550</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11532#p11532"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I guess this could be in Pianoteq 4. I&#039;m sure to have extensive discussions with Modartt about improving their GUI for that version <i class="far fa-smile-wink smiley"></i></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[EvilDragon]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=618</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-04-16T12:37:24Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11532#p11532</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11531#p11531"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>very good idea(s)!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Luc Henrion]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=6</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-04-16T11:01:03Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11531#p11531</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[New feature suggestion:  Metering]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11520#p11520"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve never really thought about this because I tend to use Pianoteq within a host, but for standalone in particular, I feel that the program could <span class="bbu">really</span> benefit from a better metering system.&nbsp; (I&#039;ve been using a fair amount of visual analysis lately.)&nbsp; The single VU meter in the &quot;Output&quot; section is woefully inadequate and does nothing to give an idea of the stereo (or surround) image.</p><p>I propose one general improvement:</p><p>In the &quot;Sound Recording&quot; room, in the <span class="bbu">dead space</span> under the &quot;Level&quot; &amp; &quot;Delay&quot; compensation buttons (ooooo, that text for &quot;compensation&quot; is especially small, I&#039;m a-goin&#039; blind, guys...), why not install a <strong><span class="bbu">vertical</span></strong> VU meter for each microphone?</p><p>This &quot;little&quot; improvement would be quite noticeable (and appreciated).</p><p>(Any way to measure phase/delay here, too?&nbsp; Though I&#039;ll be happy with just volume!!!)</p><p>A secondary, lesser (but possibly desired) improvement:&nbsp; in the &quot;Output&quot; section, add a second VU meter (read:&nbsp; squeeze that sucker in there!!!) below the current meter.&nbsp; In mono, they would both read the same data (or one meter could grey out?), but they would accurately reflect differences in stereo mode.&nbsp; (But I&#039;m definitely more interested in seeing meters in for &quot;Sound Recording!!!&quot;)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dhalfen]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=536</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-04-15T13:06:08Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=11520#p11520</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
