<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Yamaha P-225 Custom Velocity Curve for Pianoteq 9]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=13575</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Yamaha P-225 Custom Velocity Curve for Pianoteq 9.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 23:41:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Yamaha P-225 Custom Velocity Curve for Pianoteq 9]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1010258#p1010258</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello everyone,</p><p>I would like to share a custom velocity curve that I have been testing with my Yamaha P-225 (GHC action) and Pianoteq 9 Standard. I hope it serves as a useful starting point for other P-225 owners.</p><p>I started with a velocity curve originally shared by another user for the Yamaha P-525:</p><p>Velocity = [0, 33, 82, 104; 0, 34, 97, 127]</p><p>However, I found that I needed to adjust the input values to obtain a response that felt more natural on the P-225’s action.</p><p>After testing and making manual adjustments, I settled on the following points (Input -&gt; Output):</p><p>* 0 -&gt; 0<br />* 33 -&gt; 34<br />* 90 -&gt; 97 (changed from 82)<br />* 120 -&gt; 127 (changed from 104)</p><p>Pianoteq velocity string format:</p><p>Velocity = [0, 33, 90, 120; 0, 34, 97, 127]</p><p>Testing with different piano instruments and presets</p><p>I tested this curve across five piano models from three Pianoteq instrument packs, using the following presets:</p><p>* Steinway Model D: New York Steinway Model D (Classical) and Hamburg Steinway Model D (Classical).<br />* PETROF Grand Pianos: ANT. PETROF 275 (Warm) and PETROF 284 Mistral (Warm).<br />* Bösendorfer: Concert Grand 280VC (Warm).</p><p>I wanted to ensure the dynamic response felt comfortable and musical across different acoustic profiles rather than tailoring it to a single instrument.</p><p>My experience with this curve</p><p>So far, I am very pleased with the results. The response feels slightly more expressive than the default linear curve while maintaining detailed control over low dynamics:</p><p>* Very quiet pianissimo notes are easy to play and control.<br />* Dynamic transitions feel smooth across the mid-range.<br />* Reaching forte feels natural without having to strike the keys excessively hard.</p><p>I used the onboard CFX sound of the P-225 as my reference to achieve a Pianoteq response that felt familiar under my fingers.</p><p>A note about accessibility</p><p>I am blind and use a screen reader. I found that Pianoteq’s built-in velocity calibration assistant has some accessibility limitations, making it difficult to complete calibration reliably using screen-reading software alone.</p><p>For this reason, I used an existing curve for a similar Yamaha keyboard as a baseline and adjusted the input values manually through listening and playing tests.</p><p>Background</p><p>I am a hobbyist learning piano technique and exploring sound design, not an advanced pianist. My setup is a Yamaha P-225 (GHC action) running Pianoteq 9 Standard.</p><p>Velocity response is naturally subjective and depends on individual technique and preferences. I am sharing this as a practical starting point based on my own testing with the P-225, rather than as an official Yamaha calibration.</p><p>If other P-225 owners decide to try it, I would love to hear your feedback!</p><p>Thank you!</p><p>Update:</p><p>After some further testing, I found another velocity curve that I currently prefer over the one I originally posted.</p><p>I came across this curve in another Pianoteq forum discussion about the Yamaha CLP-895GP:</p><p>Velocity = [0, 18, 109, 127; 0, 0, 127, 127]</p><p>I decided to try it with my Yamaha P-225, and so far I like the response even more. It feels more natural and expressive to me, especially when controlling the dynamics from very soft playing to forte.</p><p>The original curve I posted was experimental, and I am still experimenting with different settings. I will probably continue testing and may eventually modify this curve or try other curves I come across. For now, this is the one I prefer on my P-225, but I would still be interested in hearing other users’ experiences and suggestions.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (JoseLainez)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 23:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1010258#p1010258</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
