<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Note Number as Modulation Source]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=13476</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Note Number as Modulation Source.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 14:27:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Note Number as Modulation Source]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009847#p1009847</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Alexis Thibault wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Indeed, using the note number as a modulation source is not supported currently. We consider making more parameters &quot;Note Edit&quot;-able in the future, would that be a good solution for your purpose?</p></blockquote></div><p>For what I&#039;m trying to do <strong>right now</strong>, yes - the particular patch I was working on needs to shorten all the envelope times with increasing pitch, to keep the length of time air is supplied in a constant ratio with the response time of the pipe.</p><p>In general, though, I think including note number as a modulation source is probably a cleaner way to solve more problems for more users. In the process of refining a patch for performance use, slight modulations by note number can be useful across essentially every parameter on the entire synthesis engine. <em>(For an example, in a patch I put together or find as a preset on a more traditional software synth, I would fully expect anywhere from a fifth to a half of the modulation links <strong>total</strong> to have note number as their source!)</em> Besides, if your target user is mainly familiar with synthesizers, note number as a modulation source is the standard way to accomplish this kind of voicing across the keyboard; it&#039;s what they&#039;ll expect. On the other hand, if you&#039;re instead going for more organists who are interested in synthesis, I can very much see the reason to do things the way you are suggesting here!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (tscheevel)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 14:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009847#p1009847</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Note Number as Modulation Source]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009815#p1009815</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Positive/Negative keytracking would be a great feature!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Mnls)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 08:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009815#p1009815</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Note Number as Modulation Source]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009614#p1009614</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Alexis Thibault wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Indeed, using the note number as a modulation source is not supported currently. We consider making more parameters &quot;Note Edit&quot;-able in the future, would that be a good solution for your purpose?</p></blockquote></div><p>As tscheevel stated, &quot;keytrack&quot; is really the correct term for modulation by note number.&nbsp; It should be capable of working in negative and positive mod values with mod level being a parameter - just as you have mod levels for all the other modulation sources.&nbsp; So for example, assign keytrack to modulate volume and you can either get louder notes or quieter notes when you play higher up the keyboard.&nbsp; &nbsp;It can be useful for a lot of parameter modulation.&nbsp; This is one of the things I suggested as a beta tester.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Cellomangler)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 19:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009614#p1009614</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Note Number as Modulation Source]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009607#p1009607</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, using the note number as a modulation source is not supported currently. We consider making more parameters &quot;Note Edit&quot;-able in the future, would that be a good solution for your purpose?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Alexis Thibault)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 11:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009607#p1009607</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Note Number as Modulation Source]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009532#p1009532</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi all - I&#039;ve been trying to work out how to get note number <em>( / keytrack )</em> as a modulation source within Airteq, but haven&#039;t gotten any ideas better than going into the MIDI mapping page and mapping every single Note On event to Timbre values 0.00 through 1.00. Before I spent an hour clicking <em>(for something I&#039;m not even sure would work with polyphonic playing)</em>, I decided it would be a good idea to ask here to see if anyone else had found a better solution.</p><br /><p>Have any of you been able to find a way to use note number / keytrack as a modulation source in Airteq?</p><br /><p><em>For anyone searching for the answer to this same question, but are only interested in setting the destination as the volume of a stop, this <strong>is</strong> easily available by right-clicking on the Volume knob of that stop, then clicking on the &quot;Note Edit&quot; button in the box that comes up.</em></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (tscheevel)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 15:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009532#p1009532</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
