<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Note Number as Modulation Source]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=13476&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2026-10-02T14:27:08Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=13476</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Note Number as Modulation Source]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009847#p1009847"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Alexis Thibault wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Indeed, using the note number as a modulation source is not supported currently. We consider making more parameters &quot;Note Edit&quot;-able in the future, would that be a good solution for your purpose?</p></blockquote></div><p>For what I&#039;m trying to do <strong>right now</strong>, yes - the particular patch I was working on needs to shorten all the envelope times with increasing pitch, to keep the length of time air is supplied in a constant ratio with the response time of the pipe.</p><p>In general, though, I think including note number as a modulation source is probably a cleaner way to solve more problems for more users. In the process of refining a patch for performance use, slight modulations by note number can be useful across essentially every parameter on the entire synthesis engine. <em>(For an example, in a patch I put together or find as a preset on a more traditional software synth, I would fully expect anywhere from a fifth to a half of the modulation links <strong>total</strong> to have note number as their source!)</em> Besides, if your target user is mainly familiar with synthesizers, note number as a modulation source is the standard way to accomplish this kind of voicing across the keyboard; it&#039;s what they&#039;ll expect. On the other hand, if you&#039;re instead going for more organists who are interested in synthesis, I can very much see the reason to do things the way you are suggesting here!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[tscheevel]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=11097</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-10-02T14:27:08Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009847#p1009847</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Note Number as Modulation Source]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009815#p1009815"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Positive/Negative keytracking would be a great feature!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Mnls]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=7564</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-09-30T08:37:45Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009815#p1009815</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Note Number as Modulation Source]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009614#p1009614"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Alexis Thibault wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Indeed, using the note number as a modulation source is not supported currently. We consider making more parameters &quot;Note Edit&quot;-able in the future, would that be a good solution for your purpose?</p></blockquote></div><p>As tscheevel stated, &quot;keytrack&quot; is really the correct term for modulation by note number.&nbsp; It should be capable of working in negative and positive mod values with mod level being a parameter - just as you have mod levels for all the other modulation sources.&nbsp; So for example, assign keytrack to modulate volume and you can either get louder notes or quieter notes when you play higher up the keyboard.&nbsp; &nbsp;It can be useful for a lot of parameter modulation.&nbsp; This is one of the things I suggested as a beta tester.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Cellomangler]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=495</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-09-21T19:13:19Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009614#p1009614</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Note Number as Modulation Source]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009607#p1009607"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, using the note number as a modulation source is not supported currently. We consider making more parameters &quot;Note Edit&quot;-able in the future, would that be a good solution for your purpose?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Alexis Thibault]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=9658</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-09-21T11:57:13Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009607#p1009607</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Note Number as Modulation Source]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009532#p1009532"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi all - I&#039;ve been trying to work out how to get note number <em>( / keytrack )</em> as a modulation source within Airteq, but haven&#039;t gotten any ideas better than going into the MIDI mapping page and mapping every single Note On event to Timbre values 0.00 through 1.00. Before I spent an hour clicking <em>(for something I&#039;m not even sure would work with polyphonic playing)</em>, I decided it would be a good idea to ask here to see if anyone else had found a better solution.</p><br /><p>Have any of you been able to find a way to use note number / keytrack as a modulation source in Airteq?</p><br /><p><em>For anyone searching for the answer to this same question, but are only interested in setting the destination as the volume of a stop, this <strong>is</strong> easily available by right-clicking on the Volume knob of that stop, then clicking on the &quot;Note Edit&quot; button in the box that comes up.</em></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[tscheevel]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=11097</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-09-18T15:59:08Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009532#p1009532</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
