<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Help deciding between Yamaha P525 and Casio Hybrid GP310]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=13293</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Help deciding between Yamaha P525 and Casio Hybrid GP310.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 09:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Help deciding between Yamaha P525 and Casio Hybrid GP310]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1010064#p1010064</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>bani223 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Tricky question cause the 7000 is more of a competition with yamaha or even an upgrade vs the yamaha. Casio fanboy here but why set aside the 7000? Is it damaged? Showing unacceptable but probably normal wear with use?</p><p>I played both in showrooms and the yamaha has a great feeling initially but i assume it degrades with use much faster than the casio.</p></blockquote></div><p>Hi bani223</p><p>I was initially going to replace the 7000 with an AP750. But I&#039;m so pleased I went for the P525. It&#039;s, for me, the best yet of all the many boards I&#039;ve owned. I&#039;ve had several Yammies over the years, P120S, CP33, P515W. But this one is my favourite. At the time, the 7000 was my best yet. But the P525 clinched it for me. I love the longer pivot length and haptic feedback of the heavier (than the 7000) action/keybed, the consistent escapement simulation, and the narrower black keys. I also love the simulated ebony keytops and the even spacing/regulation of the keys themselves.</p><p>I&#039;m glad I made the switch.</p><p>Warmest regards,</p><p>Chris</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (sigasa)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 09:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1010064#p1010064</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Help deciding between Yamaha P525 and Casio Hybrid GP310]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1010030#p1010030</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Tricky question cause the 7000 is more of a competition with yamaha or even an upgrade vs the yamaha. Casio fanboy here but why set aside the 7000? Is it damaged? Showing unacceptable but probably normal wear with use?</p><p>I played both in showrooms and the yamaha has a great feeling initially but i assume it degrades with use much faster than the casio.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (bani223)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 01:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1010030#p1010030</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Help deciding between Yamaha P525 and Casio Hybrid GP310]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009922#p1009922</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thinking about it , I included keyscape in the list of good potential candidates as it doesn’t have sympathetic resonance . But I realised that keyscape does’nt support half pedalling technique at all ( like many libraries) you may want&nbsp; to look how to exploit the work you have done in pedalling to simulate half pedal for keyscape community and co) using&nbsp; CC64 intermediate values again it wouldn’t be 100% realistic because of above limitations but it would certainly be better than original software . </p><p>2 additional questions&nbsp; :&nbsp; <br />What about Una corda ? You didn’t mention it <br />What about latency impact ?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Pianistically)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 11:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009922#p1009922</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Help deciding between Yamaha P525 and Casio Hybrid GP310]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009921#p1009921</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Olivier W wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>Pianistically wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>Kengrayfield wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Very interesting! I suppose this is redundant for Pianoteq?</p></blockquote></div><p> Indeed. Actually , from my perspective, you are losing a fundamental resonance behaviour is you implement it with pianoteq&nbsp; as&nbsp; the SympResHost&nbsp; acts as filter reacting to audio but doesn&#039;t work as&nbsp; a coupled physical system which is what Pianoteq models.&nbsp; Real sympathetic resonance happens with&nbsp; strings mechanically coupled through the bridge and soundboard.&nbsp; The SympResHost listens to an audio signal and excites resonant filters . The calibration only measures single-note decay, not actual coupling.It may sound convincing but doesn&#039;t compare to&nbsp; what Pianoteq delivers <br />Now this plugin could be useful for owners of&nbsp; some piano libraries that lack a good resonance implementation . ( keycape, vsl) . I wouldn&#039;t use it with Garrison CFX or VILabs (Modern D, Modern U ) as they have beautiful resonance natively .</p></blockquote></div><br /><p>Hi, Olivier here, the developer of PianoToLife. Thanks Chris for the mention, and thanks Pianistically for looking into it. Just one factual precision, since I can see how the description could give that impression.</p><p>The calibration does not only measure the decay of each note. It plays every key on its own and measures, for each string, its partials: their exact frequencies (so the inharmonicity of that piano), their levels, the decay of each partial, and their stereo image. The coupling between strings is not recorded separately: it is computed from those measured partials, according to how closely the partials of one string match those of another. Each string is then a set of resonators, driven by the real sound of the hosted piano, with dampers, half-pedal and pedal catch.</p><p>PianoToLife doesn&#039;t aim to model a whole piano like Pianoteq does: its goal is to make sampled pianos more realistic and musical. Personally, I believe in a hybrid approach, sampling plus modelling, but every approach is useful: everyone finds what they love, whether it&#039;s pure sampling, pure modelling, or a hybrid.</p><p>Best regards,<br />Olivier</p></blockquote></div><p> hi Olivieri think you may have misunderstood what I wrote or blame me i wasn’t clear enough . What I meant is that in&nbsp; a physical piano string resonance is not a linear convolution and the way sympathetic resonance works relies on the coupling between the bridge and the sound&nbsp; board that you cannot extract by recording individual notes . This non -linear transfer of energy via the bridge is what creates unique sound with particular beatings and pitch shift and cannot be reproduced by a resonator.&nbsp; But again I think your plug-in is great for sampled libraries that have poor implementation of resonance ,</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Pianistically)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 11:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009921#p1009921</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Help deciding between Yamaha P525 and Casio Hybrid GP310]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009917#p1009917</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Pianistically wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>Kengrayfield wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>sigasa wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Olivier Frappier has created a program called &#039;SympResHost&#039; which I stumbled across about a week ago. I use it primarily for the dedicated P525 option which allows for variable note-off. It works very well (thank you Olivier!). And thank you Borealis.</p><p><a href="https://github.com/owfrappier/SympResHost">https://github.com/owfrappier/SympResHost</a></p><p>I use this because I don&#039;t have Logic!</p><p>Warmest regards,</p><p>Chris</p></blockquote></div><p>Very interesting! I suppose this is redundant for Pianoteq?</p></blockquote></div><p> Indeed. Actually , from my perspective, you are losing a fundamental resonance behaviour is you implement it with pianoteq&nbsp; as&nbsp; the SympResHost&nbsp; acts as filter reacting to audio but doesn&#039;t work as&nbsp; a coupled physical system which is what Pianoteq models.&nbsp; Real sympathetic resonance happens with&nbsp; strings mechanically coupled through the bridge and soundboard.&nbsp; The SympResHost listens to an audio signal and excites resonant filters . The calibration only measures single-note decay, not actual coupling.It may sound convincing but doesn&#039;t compare to&nbsp; what Pianoteq delivers <br />Now this plugin could be useful for owners of&nbsp; some piano libraries that lack a good resonance implementation . ( keycape, vsl) . I wouldn&#039;t use it with Garrison CFX or VILabs (Modern D, Modern U ) as they have beautiful resonance natively .</p></blockquote></div><br /><p>Hi, Olivier here, the developer of PianoToLife. Thanks Chris for the mention, and thanks Pianistically for looking into it. Just one factual precision, since I can see how the description could give that impression.</p><p>The calibration does not only measure the decay of each note. It plays every key on its own and measures, for each string, its partials: their exact frequencies (so the inharmonicity of that piano), their levels, the decay of each partial, and their stereo image. The coupling between strings is not recorded separately: it is computed from those measured partials, according to how closely the partials of one string match those of another. Each string is then a set of resonators, driven by the real sound of the hosted piano, with dampers, half-pedal and pedal catch.</p><p>PianoToLife doesn&#039;t aim to model a whole piano like Pianoteq does: its goal is to make sampled pianos more realistic and musical. Personally, I believe in a hybrid approach, sampling plus modelling, but every approach is useful: everyone finds what they love, whether it&#039;s pure sampling, pure modelling, or a hybrid.</p><p>Best regards,<br />Olivier</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Olivier W)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 18:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009917#p1009917</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Help deciding between Yamaha P525 and Casio Hybrid GP310]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009882#p1009882</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Pianistically wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>Kengrayfield wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>sigasa wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Olivier Frappier has created a program called &#039;SympResHost&#039; which I stumbled across about a week ago. I use it primarily for the dedicated P525 option which allows for variable note-off. It works very well (thank you Olivier!). And thank you Borealis.</p><p><a href="https://github.com/owfrappier/SympResHost">https://github.com/owfrappier/SympResHost</a></p><p>I use this because I don&#039;t have Logic!</p><p>Warmest regards,</p><p>Chris</p></blockquote></div><p>Very interesting! I suppose this is redundant for Pianoteq?</p></blockquote></div><p> Indeed. Actually , from my perspective, you are losing a fundamental resonance behaviour is you implement it with pianoteq&nbsp; as&nbsp; the SympResHost&nbsp; acts as filter reacting to audio but doesn&#039;t work as&nbsp; a coupled physical system which is what Pianoteq models.&nbsp; Real sympathetic resonance happens with&nbsp; strings mechanically coupled through the bridge and soundboard.&nbsp; The SympResHost listens to an audio signal and excites resonant filters . The calibration only measures single-note decay, not actual coupling.It may sound convincing but doesn&#039;t compare to&nbsp; what Pianoteq delivers <br />Now this plugin could be useful for owners of&nbsp; some piano libraries that lack a good resonance implementation . ( keycape, vsl) . I wouldn&#039;t use it with Garrison CFX or VILabs (Modern D, Modern U ) as they have beautiful resonance natively .</p></blockquote></div><br /><p>Yes, Olivier designed this for sampled pianos. I don&#039;t use the resonance side of things. I just use it to obtain variable note-off for my P525.</p><p>Warmest regards,</p><p>Chris</p><p>P.s. &#039;SympResHost&#039; is now renamed &#039;PianoToLife&#039;.</p><p>PianoToLife 9.1.2 — the new name of SympResHost | Piano World <a href="https://share.google/Xy71febJvtYwR0QG5">https://share.google/Xy71febJvtYwR0QG5</a></p><p>And here&#039;s the website link</p><p><a href="https://github.com/owfrappier/PianoToLife">https://github.com/owfrappier/PianoToLife</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (sigasa)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 14:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009882#p1009882</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Help deciding between Yamaha P525 and Casio Hybrid GP310]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009879#p1009879</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Kengrayfield wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>sigasa wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>sigasa wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Thank you Borealis, appreciated,</p><p>Warmest regards,</p><p>Chris</p></blockquote></div><p>Olivier Frappier has created a program called &#039;SympResHost&#039; which I stumbled across about a week ago. I use it primarily for the dedicated P525 option which allows for variable note-off. It works very well (thank you Olivier!). And thank you Borealis.</p><p><a href="https://github.com/owfrappier/SympResHost">https://github.com/owfrappier/SympResHost</a></p><p>I use this because I don&#039;t have Logic!</p><p>Warmest regards,</p><p>Chris</p></blockquote></div><p>Very interesting! I suppose this is redundant for Pianoteq?</p></blockquote></div><p> Indeed. Actually , from my perspective, you are losing a fundamental resonance behaviour is you implement it with pianoteq&nbsp; as&nbsp; the SympResHost&nbsp; acts as filter reacting to audio but doesn&#039;t work as&nbsp; a coupled physical system which is what Pianoteq models.&nbsp; Real sympathetic resonance happens with&nbsp; strings mechanically coupled through the bridge and soundboard.&nbsp; The SympResHost listens to an audio signal and excites resonant filters . The calibration only measures single-note decay, not actual coupling.It may sound convincing but doesn&#039;t compare to&nbsp; what Pianoteq delivers <br />Now this plugin could be useful for owners of&nbsp; some piano libraries that lack a good resonance implementation . ( keycape, vsl) . I wouldn&#039;t use it with Garrison CFX or VILabs (Modern D, Modern U ) as they have beautiful resonance natively .</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Pianistically)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 07:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009879#p1009879</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Help deciding between Yamaha P525 and Casio Hybrid GP310]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009876#p1009876</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>sigasa wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>sigasa wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>Borealis wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Olivier had made a script for Logic (if you own it) : <a href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=12022">https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=12022</a></p><p>Maybe it could help you ?</p></blockquote></div><p>Thank you Borealis, appreciated,</p><p>Warmest regards,</p><p>Chris</p></blockquote></div><p>Olivier Frappier has created a program called &#039;SympResHost&#039; which I stumbled across about a week ago. I use it primarily for the dedicated P525 option which allows for variable note-off. It works very well (thank you Olivier!). And thank you Borealis.</p><p><a href="https://github.com/owfrappier/SympResHost">https://github.com/owfrappier/SympResHost</a></p><p>I use this because I don&#039;t have Logic!</p><p>Warmest regards,</p><p>Chris</p></blockquote></div><p>Very interesting! I suppose this is redundant for Pianoteq?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Kengrayfield)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 00:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009876#p1009876</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Help deciding between Yamaha P525 and Casio Hybrid GP310]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009871#p1009871</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>sigasa wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Olivier Frappier has created a program called &#039;SympResHost&#039; ...</p></blockquote></div><p>Excellent find !</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (DEZ)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 17:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009871#p1009871</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Help deciding between Yamaha P525 and Casio Hybrid GP310]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009844#p1009844</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s a great news ! Thanks for the info, too.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Borealis)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 06:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009844#p1009844</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Help deciding between Yamaha P525 and Casio Hybrid GP310]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009840#p1009840</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>sigasa wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>Borealis wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Olivier had made a script for Logic (if you own it) : <a href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=12022">https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=12022</a></p><p>Maybe it could help you ?</p></blockquote></div><p>Thank you Borealis, appreciated,</p><p>Warmest regards,</p><p>Chris</p></blockquote></div><p>Olivier Frappier has created a program called &#039;SympResHost&#039; which I stumbled across about a week ago. I use it primarily for the dedicated P525 option which allows for variable note-off. It works very well (thank you Olivier!). And thank you Borealis.</p><p><a href="https://github.com/owfrappier/SympResHost">https://github.com/owfrappier/SympResHost</a></p><p>I use this because I don&#039;t have Logic!</p><p>Warmest regards,</p><p>Chris</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (sigasa)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 22:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009840#p1009840</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Help deciding between Yamaha P525 and Casio Hybrid GP310]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009426#p1009426</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Borealis wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Olivier had made a script for Logic (if you own it) : <a href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=12022">https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=12022</a></p><p>Maybe it could help you ?</p></blockquote></div><p>Thank you Borealis, appreciated,</p><p>Warmest regards,</p><p>Chris</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (sigasa)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 20:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009426#p1009426</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Help deciding between Yamaha P525 and Casio Hybrid GP310]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009410#p1009410</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Olivier had made a script for Logic (if you own it) : <a href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=12022">https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=12022</a></p><p>Maybe it could help you ?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Borealis)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 23:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009410#p1009410</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Help deciding between Yamaha P525 and Casio Hybrid GP310]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009408#p1009408</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone here know if there is an apple (OS) utility/plugin etc. that I can use to get variable note-off from the P525 please?</p><p>Warmest regards,</p><p>Chris</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (sigasa)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 22:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009408#p1009408</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Help deciding between Yamaha P525 and Casio Hybrid GP310]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009390#p1009390</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://freeimage.host/"><span class="postimg"><img src="https://iili.io/nq3wz91.jpg" alt="https://iili.io/nq3wz91.jpg" title="https://iili.io/nq3wz91.jpg"/></span></a></p><p>Better image!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (sigasa)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 17:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1009390#p1009390</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
