<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Pianoteq 9 Microphone Interface]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=12714</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Pianoteq 9 Microphone Interface.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 22:28:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq 9 Microphone Interface]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1004715#p1004715</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Personally I feel I am especially enthusiastic, since I can better visualize standardized controls now without my having to go to a DAW.&nbsp; This new approach appears to line up well with similar virtual instruments like MODO Drum (modeled drums) from <strong>IK Multimedia</strong> and even Superior Drummer (sampled drums) from <strong>Toontrack</strong>. Both which include mixers too.</p><p>Put in a DAW though, I&#039;ve yet actually to try.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Amen Ptah Ra)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 22:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1004715#p1004715</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Pianoteq 9 Microphone Interface]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1004543#p1004543</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hey all!</p><p>How do you feel about the new interface design for the microphone section?</p><p>I get the decision for a mixer-based approached, since that might be more intuitive/known from DAWs and other designs, <br />but I do really miss the multiple outputs/matrix kind of approach. </p><p>What do you think?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (LarsKroszewsky)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2025 08:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1004543#p1004543</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
