<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Shigeru VS Garritan]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=12215&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2025-03-13T16:51:19Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=12215</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Shigeru VS Garritan]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1001524#p1001524"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello</p><p>Small video comparison that I made between Pianoteq 8 Shigeru and Garritan CFX great concert.</p><p>(It&#039;s a little modeling against sample, mathematics against physics, electrons against molecules, Kawai against Yamaha)...</p><p>In short!</p><p>I did not try to completely match the sounds (which is very complicated as the parameters are numerous) but the peak levels are standardized. It will therefore be a sound as if out of the cover knowing that Pianoteq can be much more tweaked</p><p>I like both VSTs for my part and for their respective benefits. &lt;</p><p>Tell me what you think..</p><p>Next time I will try to make a more rigorous protocol maybe but it is above all a global approach that I had here in mind with this test.<br /><a href="https://youtu.be/VTkD3RWY8K8?si=6cOp3X3-REdGEBXz">https://youtu.be/VTkD3RWY8K8?si=6cOp3X3-REdGEBXz</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Krisp]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8853</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2025-03-13T16:51:19Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1001524#p1001524</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
