<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Correlation of dynamic markings to velocity values]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=11516</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Correlation of dynamic markings to velocity values.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 18:32:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Correlation of dynamic markings to velocity values]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=996788#p996788</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Steven Brown wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>What velocity values should be used in Pianoteq to attain the following dynamic levels in a piano score? In case it depends on the model, I am interested in values for the YC5.<br /><em><br />ppp<br />pp<br />p<br />mp<br />mf<br />f<br />ff<br />fff<br /></em></p></blockquote></div><p> the velocity graph in pianoteq gives you the standard values with the linear curve .Pianoteq manual indicates that the reference points by default are p=32&nbsp; mf=64&nbsp; f=96 .&nbsp; &nbsp;But you can adjust these values of course and remap the values to include pppp and ffff dynamics&nbsp; which&nbsp; you find in some Rachmaninov scores . In which case you may reserve&nbsp; pppp with any value between 2 and 8 ( velocity 1&nbsp; triggers a&nbsp; silent note in pianoteq)&nbsp; and 127 for ffff which in Italian notation corresponds to the absolute maximum your keyboard can produce .</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Pianistically)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 18:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=996788#p996788</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Correlation of dynamic markings to velocity values]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=996787#p996787</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I would say you can&#039;t got far wrong just dividing the 0-127 possible velocities into 8 ranges for the 8 markings and using the center of each as your nominal velocity:</p><p>ppp =&nbsp; &nbsp; 8<br />pp&nbsp; &nbsp;=&nbsp; 24<br />p&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;=&nbsp; 40<br />mp&nbsp; =&nbsp; 56<br />mf&nbsp; &nbsp;=&nbsp; 72<br />f&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; =&nbsp; 88<br />ff&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;= 104<br />fff&nbsp; &nbsp; = 120</p><p>If you find this isn&#039;t rendering the way you&#039;d like for a given piece, you can adjust Pianoteq&#039;s velocity curve to effectively shift all the velocities up/down, expand/reduce the range or change the slope in different ranges without having to re-visit the individual note velocities, understanding that the variation of dynamics within each marking&#039;s range is where all the magic happens (so far as velocity goes) in an actual performance.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (brundlefly)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 18:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=996787#p996787</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Correlation of dynamic markings to velocity values]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=996782#p996782</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>What velocity values should be used in Pianoteq to attain the following dynamic levels in a piano score? In case it depends on the model, I am interested in values for the YC5.<br /><em><br />ppp<br />pp<br />p<br />mp<br />mf<br />f<br />ff<br />fff<br /></em></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Steven Brown)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 16:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=996782#p996782</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
