<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Harpsichord quality]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=11380&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2026-05-23T16:50:10Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=11380</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Harpsichord quality]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007968#p1007968"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>rumburak wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I continue to be captivated by the sounds of <strong>Hans Ruckers II&#039;s harpsichord</strong> from <strong>Pianoteq</strong>. In this recording, you can hear its various sonorities: 8&#039; I+II, 4&#039; Lute, 8&#039; I, and finally 8&#039; I+II + 4&#039;,</p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/PPhT8cNGJOQ?si=vNIB-y8X1MSWdVvD">https://youtu.be/PPhT8cNGJOQ?si=vNIB-y8X1MSWdVvD</a></p></blockquote></div><p>Beautiful! I like the variety of timbre you have used for this &quot;Romanesca&quot;, thank you rumburak!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Philippe Guillaume]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-05-23T16:50:10Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007968#p1007968</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Harpsichord quality]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007957#p1007957"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I continue to be captivated by the sounds of <strong>Hans Ruckers II&#039;s harpsichord</strong> from <strong>Pianoteq</strong>. In this recording, you can hear its various sonorities: 8&#039; I+II, 4&#039; Lute, 8&#039; I, and finally 8&#039; I+II + 4&#039;,</p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/PPhT8cNGJOQ?si=vNIB-y8X1MSWdVvD">https://youtu.be/PPhT8cNGJOQ?si=vNIB-y8X1MSWdVvD</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[rumburak]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=7629</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-05-22T21:14:46Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007957#p1007957</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Harpsichord quality]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007838#p1007838"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>This is a very generous share. Thank you very much! </p><div class="quotebox"><cite>tmyoung wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I made an interesting discovery this evening.&nbsp; I took a few minutes to finally get back to this thread and get my Rucker&#039;s preset groomed (more than it was) for upload.&nbsp; In the process, I realized that--at least for the Rucker&#039;s--PTQ has a damper system that is identical to its piano models in operation on the harpsichord by default.&nbsp; This is probably the least realistic function of all piano the functions for a harpsichord.&nbsp; While I theoretically welcome the flexibility that it offers for sound design, tone creation, and instrument invention, that is absolutely not something that should be there/turned on by default in the factory presets.</p><p>I wonder how much that factor alone is what the OP is bothered by.&nbsp; I have tried to &quot;turn off&quot; the damper system in the preset.&nbsp; I believe that it&#039;s best to set Last Damper to 0 and all but turn off sympathetic resonance (I&#039;ve found around 0.15 works best).&nbsp; The problem is that the default engine has the sympathetic resonance that you&#039;d expect from a piano&#039;s full trichord scaling, which doesn&#039;t remotely apply to the harpsichord, and thus the sound without dampers becomes far too wet and reverb-like.&nbsp; Such resonance should probably be kept on at some level, but definitely not at the default one.&nbsp; So turning off the dampers and decreasing the sympathetic resonance, seems to really let the harpsichord act more like it should.</p><p>I&#039;m now very curious how OP and others feel about the PTQ harpsichords when the dampers are removed from the equation.&nbsp; For what it&#039;s worth, my still very work-in-progress preset is in the FXP corner now.&nbsp; It feels closer to the samples provided, but not quite there yet.&nbsp; I&#039;ll continue working on it as I have the chance.</p><p><a href="https://forum.modartt.com/file/73bvvkgx">https://forum.modartt.com/file/73bvvkgx</a></p></blockquote></div>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[bani223]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8319</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-05-03T19:40:22Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007838#p1007838</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Harpsichord quality]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007781#p1007781"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Andro wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Have just today purchased Pianoteq for Dorico. It&#039;s fabulous.</p><p>I am a harpsichord maker and player in Australia. Consequently very critical and sensitive. I&#039;ll get the harpsichord/s and get back with my opinion! Harpsichord is a very difficult instrument to record well and I imagine creating samples is also very difficult.</p></blockquote></div><p>Ooh I&#039;d be interested in hearing your thoughts on how the various models compare. Do let us know!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[daniel_r328]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=10375</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-04-29T22:45:29Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007781#p1007781</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Harpsichord quality]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007770#p1007770"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Have just today purchased Pianoteq for Dorico. It&#039;s fabulous.</p><p>I am a harpsichord maker and player in Australia. Consequently very critical and sensitive. I&#039;ll get the harpsichord/s and get back with my opinion! Harpsichord is a very difficult instrument to record well and I imagine creating samples is also very difficult.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Andro]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=10888</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-04-29T20:18:58Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007770#p1007770</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Harpsichord quality]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007712#p1007712"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>teacue wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>...After some search I found out that the &quot;Viscount Sonus 60&quot; uses a &quot;Real Audio Rendering&quot; solution to create reverb.<br />As I understand it, it seems more sophisticated than Convolution Reverb.</p></blockquote></div><p>As I mentioned above, the Pianoteq connected to the Viscount&#039;s audio system sounds spatially better than the same sound recorded in two channels and played through two computer speakers (standard stereo).<br />This is most likely due to the technology you mentioned and the thirteen speakers arranged in different parts of the case.</p><p><strong>My new recording using three open PIANOTEQ programs - each separately for the three keyboards.I placed the lute on the lower keyboard. On the upper keyboard - the 4-foot voice.</strong></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/tGmXy5zpZZE?si=2NzuwPcPST8q3G-w">https://youtu.be/tGmXy5zpZZE?si=2NzuwPcPST8q3G-w</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[rumburak]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=7629</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-04-24T01:15:17Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007712#p1007712</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Harpsichord quality]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007690#p1007690"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s just a marketing buzzword, since they are not explaining anything about what it does, it can be your ordinary (but finely tuned) algorithmic reverb, or a multi-channel convolution reverb, or even a raytracing reverb...</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[EvilDragon]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=618</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-04-21T12:31:59Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007690#p1007690</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Harpsichord quality]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007688#p1007688"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>rumburak wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I don&#039;t have a single method for creating the acoustic space for my recordings. In fact, it&#039;s a big problem for me, and I&#039;m not always satisfied with the results ...</p></blockquote></div><p>Thank you for your answer.<br />As i really like the sound of the acoustic spaces in your videos I had a hope for an easy solution&nbsp; <i class="far fa-smile-wink smiley"></i><br />I now understand that you take a lot of care to create them.</p><p>After some search I found out that the &quot;Viscount Sonus 60&quot; uses a &quot;Real Audio Rendering&quot; solution to create reverb.<br />As I understand it, it seems more sophisticated than Convolution Reverb.</p><p>Thanks for your thoughts.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[teacue]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=6953</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-04-21T09:03:47Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007688#p1007688</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Harpsichord quality]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007684#p1007684"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>teacue wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Out of curiosity would you mind to tell which Reverbs you use?</p></blockquote></div><p>I don&#039;t have a single method for creating the acoustic space for my recordings. In fact, it&#039;s a big problem for me, and I&#039;m not always satisfied with the results.<br />In the recording above <em>(Froberger: &quot;Lamentation&quot; FbWV 633)</em>, I use the built-in reverb from a Viscount Sonus 60 organ. In the Pianoteq, I turned off the reverb but left the delay on.</p><p>In other recordings, I use different combinations. I often add a bit of reverb from a video editing program on my computer to the already recorded reverb, because the sound carries differently when I play the instrument in the room than when I listen to the recording through speakers.<br />Generally, the sound directly from the instrument (built-in amplification in the Viscount) is better for me than from professional (Yamaha) monitors on my computer.<br />This is a big problem for me, and I worry that my recordings don&#039;t always sound good to the listeners.</p><p>Sometimes I record audio with the reverb completely turned off and then add it during video editing on my computer (using DaVinci or Vegas). However, playing the instrument &quot;dry&quot; (without reverb) is more difficult and less enjoyable.</p><p><strong>DaVinci Resolve</strong> has a very extensive section for creating room acoustics. Unfortunately, the results are rarely satisfactory.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[rumburak]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=7629</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-04-20T15:24:13Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007684#p1007684</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Harpsichord quality]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007659#p1007659"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>rumburak wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>In addition, I would like to draw attention to the equally important issue of room acoustics. It is an important element in sound creation and is also crucial for sound recording.</p></blockquote></div><p>Out of curiosity would you mind to tell which Reverbs you use?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[teacue]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=6953</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-04-17T14:51:28Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007659#p1007659</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Harpsichord quality]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007639#p1007639"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Guillaume wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>For your information, the lute sound can already be produced using the &quot;Buff Stop Pedal&quot; :-)</p></blockquote></div><p>Thanks for the info. I tried it. It works, but you need to set the MUTE parameter appropriately.</p><h5>Here is my recording today on the excellent sound of Hans Ruckers&#039; harpsichord from Pianoteq.</h5><p>A lament for the painful death of His Imperial Majesty Ferdinand III, played slowly and discreetly. Year 1657</p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/1EI1kziC0zQ?si=SJze1CS-6lExEMMJ">https://youtu.be/1EI1kziC0zQ?si=SJze1CS-6lExEMMJ</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[rumburak]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=7629</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-04-16T22:45:03Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007639#p1007639</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Harpsichord quality]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007618#p1007618"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>rumburak wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Modartt harpsichords definitely lack a lute sound. I&#039;d like to see that tone in new versions of the Pianoteq program or plugin, so I don&#039;t have to use sampled instruments.</p></blockquote></div><p>For your information, the lute sound can already be produced using the &quot;Buff Stop Pedal&quot; :-)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Guillaume Castera]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=9651</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-04-15T07:43:11Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007618#p1007618</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Harpsichord quality]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007615#p1007615"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: red">Modartt harpsichords definitely lack a <strong>lute</strong> sound. I&#039;d like to see that tone in new versions of the Pianoteq program or plugin.</span>, so I don&#039;t have to use sampled instruments.</p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/D50kReDOrwc?si=yJ8k24rP7LYMFaYD">https://youtu.be/D50kReDOrwc?si=yJ8k24rP7LYMFaYD</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[rumburak]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=7629</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-04-14T15:54:18Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007615#p1007615</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Harpsichord quality]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007613#p1007613"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t have much to say in this discussion – only that I recently had the opportunity to play a real, acoustic harpsichord and I can see and hear the difference.<br />The quality of Pianoteq harpsichords is so good that I don&#039;t plan on using sampled instruments at all.</p><p>The difference between Pianoteq harpsichords and acoustic instruments lies primarily in the keyboard mechanics, which significantly impacts the playing experience.</p><p>In addition, I would like to draw attention to the equally important issue of room acoustics. It is an important element in sound creation and is also crucial for sound recording.</p><p><em>For comparison, I&#039;ve included a series of my recordings made on various Modartt harpsichords:</em></p><h5>1. Hans Ruckers II Harpsichord <em>(in various voice combinations)</em></h5><p><a href="https://youtu.be/Yo9GiYi33SI?si=WateDA0ehlBdGij4">https://youtu.be/Yo9GiYi33SI?si=WateDA0ehlBdGij4</a></p><h5>2. Giovanni Battista Giusti (1680)</h5><p><a href="https://youtu.be/MnJxZCPbCVI?si=m9KI2zm2dA30g9VI">https://youtu.be/MnJxZCPbCVI?si=m9KI2zm2dA30g9VI</a></p><h5>3. Hans Ruckers II Harpsichord</h5><p><a href="https://youtu.be/aBjLBFx_Ugc?si=Xewzzbw0k3NjTuhu">https://youtu.be/aBjLBFx_Ugc?si=Xewzzbw0k3NjTuhu</a></p><h5>4. J.Salodiensis Virginal</h5><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3goynh5hhas?si=7TjLrDQ2lRFPb7Nh">https://youtu.be/3goynh5hhas?si=7TjLrDQ2lRFPb7Nh</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[rumburak]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=7629</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-04-14T15:13:36Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007613#p1007613</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Harpsichord quality]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007509#p1007509"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The sound decays very long when you set Last damper to 0, I don&#039;t think this is wanted at all, real harpsichords don&#039;t decay that long when you release the key...</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[EvilDragon]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=618</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-04-05T20:17:42Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007509#p1007509</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
