<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Idea for reviews: 24h license.]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=11224&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2024-01-26T18:50:44Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=11224</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Idea for reviews: 24h license.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994949#p994949"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>marcos daniel wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>Beto-Music wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I noticed there is no video review of 8.2 version yet.</p><p>On youtube there was a comparison posted in last weeks of pianoteq and other VSTs, but was using version 6. Other comparison from few days used version 8 but didn&#039;t sound like 8.2.<br />Well, this can damage pianoteq publicity, specialy the last upgrade refinfments.<br />Thinking about that I got an idea :</p><p>What about offer 24h of free license of the latest version for youtubers who create reviews and comparisons?<br />It could be like one day of full 88 keys sound or perhaps 12h of software use runing work.</p></blockquote></div><p>In any case, just to test sound, the demo is enough...</p></blockquote></div><p>That&#039;s true! One of the winners of the latest video competition used the demo version of Pianoteq. Same goes for Organteq - you can do a lot with the demo.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dazric]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5077</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2024-01-26T18:50:44Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994949#p994949</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Idea for reviews: 24h license.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994948#p994948"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>That will be nice :-)</p><p>Phil Best probably will also make a video about 8.2, since he always talk about new pianoteq sound refinements.<br />I don&#039;t want to be the one to tell Modartt what they should do, but 8.2 pleased so many people that it probably deserves some nice videos. I see no need to wait version 9 to create a promotional video.</p><p>I still remamber the first audio I ever heard from pianoteq, days before the first beta test, before the first version release. It was Rachmaninoff Op.23&nbsp; No.5.&nbsp; Compared to the rendering usin 8.2 it&#039;s like compare night and day.<br />I had the mp3 of the early version, but the HD broked year ago.</p><p>I wish Niclas have the vintage recording. It would be amazing to show how much pianoteq evolved in realism.</p><p>The 8.2 rendering of Op 23 No.5 is in the C. Bechstein mp3 demo page: </p><p><a href="https://www.modartt.com/steingraeber">https://www.modartt.com/steingraeber</a></p><div class="quotebox"><cite>dulistan heman wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I already have the studio version, Beto-Music.</p><p>I&#039;m kind of interested in creating one to compare Pianoteq v6, v7, v8.1.3, and the latest version 8.2.</p><p>The guitar also needs a special video to cover the realism of the new update.</p><p>What I don&#039;t have right now is Organtec. If I have one, I will make the video demo as well. Back in the day, I used to play the Yamaha Electone.</p><p>That would be at least three or four videos.</p></blockquote></div>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Beto-Music]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2024-01-26T18:21:53Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994948#p994948</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Idea for reviews: 24h license.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994947#p994947"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Beto-Music wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I noticed there is no video review of 8.2 version yet.</p><p>On youtube there was a comparison posted in last weeks of pianoteq and other VSTs, but was using version 6. Other comparison from few days used version 8 but didn&#039;t sound like 8.2.<br />Well, this can damage pianoteq publicity, specialy the last upgrade refinfments.<br />Thinking about that I got an idea :</p><p>What about offer 24h of free license of the latest version for youtubers who create reviews and comparisons?<br />It could be like one day of full 88 keys sound or perhaps 12h of software use runing work.</p></blockquote></div><p>In any case, just to test sound, the demo is enough...</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[marcos daniel]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=4155</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2024-01-26T17:46:18Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994947#p994947</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Idea for reviews: 24h license.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994944#p994944"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Beto-Music wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I noticed there is no video review of 8.2 version yet.</p><p>On youtube there was a comparison posted in last weeks of pianoteq and other VSTs, but was using version 6. Other comparison from few days used version 8 but didn&#039;t sound like 8.2.<br />Well, this can damage pianoteq publicity, specialy the last upgrade refinfments.<br />Thinking about that I got an idea :</p><p>What about offer 24h of free license of the latest version for youtubers who create reviews and comparisons?<br />It could be like one day of full 88 keys sound or perhaps 12h of software use runing work.</p></blockquote></div><p>I already have the studio version, Beto-Music.</p><p>I&#039;m kind of interested in creating one to compare Pianoteq v6, v7, v8.1.3, and the latest version 8.2.</p><p>The guitar also needs a special video to cover the realism of the new update.</p><p>What I don&#039;t have right now is Organtec. If I have one, I will make the video demo as well. Back in the day, I used to play the Yamaha Electone.</p><p>That would be at least three or four videos.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dulistan heman]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=6421</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2024-01-26T15:05:19Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994944#p994944</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Idea for reviews: 24h license.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994900#p994900"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I noticed there is no video review of 8.2 version yet.</p><p>On youtube there was a comparison posted in last weeks of pianoteq and other VSTs, but was using version 6. Other comparison from few days used version 8 but didn&#039;t sound like 8.2.<br />Well, this can damage pianoteq publicity, specialy the last upgrade refinfments.<br />Thinking about that I got an idea :</p><p>What about offer 24h of free license of the latest version for youtubers who create reviews and comparisons?<br />It could be like one day of full 88 keys sound or perhaps 12h of software use runing work.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Beto-Music]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2024-01-24T19:24:38Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994900#p994900</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
