<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Relaxing Piano in Minor: Vol 2]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=11210</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Relaxing Piano in Minor: Vol 2.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2024 04:48:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Relaxing Piano in Minor: Vol 2]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994889#p994889</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>budo wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>a lot of lovely stuff in here.&nbsp; i&#039;m still amazed that you&#039;re able to do this algorithmically!&nbsp; i realize there must be a lot of human input, but still.&nbsp; you&#039;re getting a great result.</p></blockquote></div><p>Hi Budo, thanks for the feedback! Indeed the human part is rather time consuming as I have to listen, tweak something, listen, tweak again, listen etc. until things generally feel like it&#039;s a good fit and I have algorithms tuned to a sound best I can.&nbsp; Then I switch to song selection and I have to listen and pick if a song is good or not. It could be my ears are horrible and I&#039;m tossing away wonderful songs. All songs in a single album are always from one tuning of the algorithms which in theory could generate perhaps 40000 mostly different (but similar) songs. Perhaps one day I will record an unselected album meaning I will let it play 20 songs in a row without my selection process. In fact a couple of years ago I tried an approach of just live streaming the songs as they were generated endlessly (24/7) both on youtube and streaming radio but in the end I get tired to keep 2 computers running dedicated to this as routinely there would be some glitch in Windows, drivers, network or my programs.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (kencarlino)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2024 04:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994889#p994889</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Relaxing Piano in Minor: Vol 2]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994872#p994872</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>a lot of lovely stuff in here.&nbsp; i&#039;m still amazed that you&#039;re able to do this algorithmically!&nbsp; i realize there must be a lot of human input, but still.&nbsp; you&#039;re getting a great result.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (budo)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 17:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994872#p994872</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Relaxing Piano in Minor: Vol 2]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994819#p994819</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Pianoteqenthusiast wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>kencarlino wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Second volume in this series. Various tweaks in the composition algorithms. Change to make the melody more dynamic in range and tempo but at the same time &quot;more&quot; adherent to the chord progressions. Overall changed how chords are played to allow for more dynamic usages. Dynamic usage of sustain pedal re-enabled. I&#039;ve use the sustain pedal off and on during this project but more often ended up sustaining notes artificially by allowing&nbsp; keys to be held longer than the number of fingers would humanly allow. While this approach can give cleaner sound it might be less warm. Last biggest change is I switched to NY Steinway D (Prelude) instead of my normal Bechstein DG (Recording 2). Might be a placebo but with Pianoteq 8.2 I feel like the NY Steinway D has a more natural sound now. For me Bechstein is still the clearest/brightest and most present but perhaps that is less realistic. </p><p>As before 20 songs seamlessly played.</p><p>As a side note: for each song that makes it in the final song list, there are probably 15-20 that I reject.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoIvJiYdN2M&amp;list=OLAK5uy_kaX7E_VK4CRuSnHF0mhBjqMvBqWEzwaBY">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoIvJiY...vBqWEzwaBY</a></p></blockquote></div><p>Hi again ken,</p><p>It is noticeable that VOL. 2 is different than Vol. 1 Various tweaks in the composition algorithms have done the job with everything it covers, but listened again and compared with VOL 1 and Vol 2 and have to say, I like VOL 1&nbsp; a&nbsp; bit more. </p><p>It&#039;s a calmer, smoother tempo and more suitable to have in the background when you&#039;re doing something at home, it doesn&#039;t mean that Vol 2 is bad but Vol 1 is more to my taste - soft, nice, de-stressing, etc. I like it. </p><p>In any case, I&#039;m enjoying Vol 1 and looking forward to Vol 3 with excitement. I can now in my turn tell you what you told me, ”Always great to see what you can do…..” (with your compositions algorithms)&nbsp; &nbsp;<i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p><p>It&#039;s nice when you make a lot of music and then you can choose those&nbsp; pieces you like most and enjoy them over and over again.</p><p>Keep going!</p><p>Best wishes,</p><p>Stig</p></blockquote></div><p>Hi Stig, </p><p>Thank you for the great feedback!&nbsp; Definitely can understand this, I tried to add interest but yes perhaps it&#039;s too much for the target style. Thanks to for the encouragement!</p><p>Thanks,<br />Ken</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (kencarlino)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2024 02:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994819#p994819</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Relaxing Piano in Minor: Vol 2]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994808#p994808</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>kencarlino wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Second volume in this series. Various tweaks in the composition algorithms. Change to make the melody more dynamic in range and tempo but at the same time &quot;more&quot; adherent to the chord progressions. Overall changed how chords are played to allow for more dynamic usages. Dynamic usage of sustain pedal re-enabled. I&#039;ve use the sustain pedal off and on during this project but more often ended up sustaining notes artificially by allowing&nbsp; keys to be held longer than the number of fingers would humanly allow. While this approach can give cleaner sound it might be less warm. Last biggest change is I switched to NY Steinway D (Prelude) instead of my normal Bechstein DG (Recording 2). Might be a placebo but with Pianoteq 8.2 I feel like the NY Steinway D has a more natural sound now. For me Bechstein is still the clearest/brightest and most present but perhaps that is less realistic. </p><p>As before 20 songs seamlessly played.</p><p>As a side note: for each song that makes it in the final song list, there are probably 15-20 that I reject.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoIvJiYdN2M&amp;list=OLAK5uy_kaX7E_VK4CRuSnHF0mhBjqMvBqWEzwaBY">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoIvJiY...vBqWEzwaBY</a></p></blockquote></div><p>Hi again ken,</p><p>It is noticeable that VOL. 2 is different than Vol. 1 Various tweaks in the composition algorithms have done the job with everything it covers, but listened again and compared with VOL 1 and Vol 2 and have to say, I like VOL 1&nbsp; a&nbsp; bit more. </p><p>It&#039;s a calmer, smoother tempo and more suitable to have in the background when you&#039;re doing something at home, it doesn&#039;t mean that Vol 2 is bad but Vol 1 is more to my taste - soft, nice, de-stressing, etc. I like it. </p><p>In any case, I&#039;m enjoying Vol 1 and looking forward to Vol 3 with excitement. I can now in my turn tell you what you told me, ”Always great to see what you can do…..” (with your compositions algorithms)&nbsp; &nbsp;<i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p><p>It&#039;s nice when you make a lot of music and then you can choose those&nbsp; pieces you like most and enjoy them over and over again.</p><p>Keep going!</p><p>Best wishes,</p><p>Stig</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Pianoteqenthusiast)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2024 13:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994808#p994808</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Relaxing Piano in Minor: Vol 2]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994800#p994800</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Second volume in this series. Various tweaks in the composition algorithms. Change to make the melody more dynamic in range and tempo but at the same time &quot;more&quot; adherent to the chord progressions. Overall changed how chords are played to allow for more dynamic usages. Dynamic usage of sustain pedal re-enabled. I&#039;ve use the sustain pedal off and on during this project but more often ended up sustaining notes artificially by allowing&nbsp; keys to be held longer than the number of fingers would humanly allow. While this approach can give cleaner sound it might be less warm. Last biggest change is I switched to NY Steinway D (Prelude) instead of my normal Bechstein DG (Recording 2). Might be a placebo but with Pianoteq 8.2 I feel like the NY Steinway D has a more natural sound now. For me Bechstein is still the clearest/brightest and most present but perhaps that is less realistic. </p><p>As before 20 songs seamlessly played.</p><p>As a side note: for each song that makes it in the final song list, there are probably 15-20 that I reject.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoIvJiYdN2M&amp;list=OLAK5uy_kaX7E_VK4CRuSnHF0mhBjqMvBqWEzwaBY">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoIvJiY...vBqWEzwaBY</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (kencarlino)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2024 04:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994800#p994800</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
