<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - This video reminds me why I stick with Pianoteq!]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=11194&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2024-01-19T15:31:45Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=11194</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: This video reminds me why I stick with Pianoteq!]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994759#p994759"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I really want a CA901!&nbsp; The action and the sound are top notch.&nbsp; As a Pianoteq controller, FP-90x has some advantages: less bulky, less expensive, USB audio, possibly more accurate MIDI.&nbsp; However, I don&#039;t like the onboard sound of the FP-90x.&nbsp; Pianoteq is much better.&nbsp; And the Roland&#039;s PHA-50, though playable, isn&#039;t quite as good as the Kawai&#039;s Grand Feel III.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Lycomedes]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8410</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2024-01-19T15:31:45Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994759#p994759</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: This video reminds me why I stick with Pianoteq!]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994751#p994751"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Kawai: yes, I like it very much - but Kawai don&#039;t do a VST (sadly) and I&#039;m not in the market for a new DP.<br />Noire: well, hmmm, it&#039;s a matter of taste. OK but not mad keen. I prefer Pianoteq!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dazric]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5077</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2024-01-19T12:19:21Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994751#p994751</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: This video reminds me why I stick with Pianoteq!]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994698#p994698"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>There are some nice sampled pianos.&nbsp; I like NI Noire and Kawai&#039;s sampled SK-EX.&nbsp; Most digital piano sounds, sampled or modelled, I just don&#039;t feel.</p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/yOe4ntClvLI">https://youtu.be/yOe4ntClvLI</a><br /><a href="https://youtu.be/uk-p99uP1wQ?t=543">https://youtu.be/uk-p99uP1wQ?t=543</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Lycomedes]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8410</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2024-01-17T22:45:56Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994698#p994698</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[This video reminds me why I stick with Pianoteq!]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994684#p994684"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Bear in mind that I was going to post this before Pianoteq&#039;s splendid 8.2 update. It showcases Pianoverse, a fairly recent offering from IK Multimedia. Given that IK have done some impressive modelling with ModoBass and ModoDrum, I wondered if Pianoverse was going to be a serious rival to Pianoteq. But no, Pianoverse is sample-based. It&#039;s received some rave reviews, apparently.</p><p>I appreciate what the pianist is trying to do here, and I can&#039;t really say that the end result is bad. But it&#039;s just a bit, well... meh.</p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/ld0euA3L0tA?si=NRgpzfrrVTGJJGeQ">https://youtu.be/ld0euA3L0tA?si=NRgpzfrrVTGJJGeQ</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dazric]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5077</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2024-01-17T13:12:30Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=994684#p994684</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
