<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Latency of 1.5ms with buffer size of 64]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1104&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2010-01-30T09:04:13Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=1104</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Latency of 1.5ms with buffer size of 64]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=9505#p9505"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve now got the buffer latency down to 1.3 using 96000 and 128 buffer. I use ASIO4ALL (latest version).</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[sigasa]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=399</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-01-30T09:04:13Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=9505#p9505</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Latency of 1.5ms with buffer size of 64]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=9238#p9238"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>sigasa wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>Glenn NK wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Which one.</p><p><a href="http://www.emu.com/products/welcome.asp?category=610&amp;">http://www.emu.com/products/welcome.asp...y=610&amp;</a></p><p>Glenn</p></blockquote></div><p>Xmidi 1x1</p></blockquote></div><p>Christopher:</p><p>Wow, that didn&#039;t break the bank did it?</p><p>Wish I&#039;d been more careful with my purchase:</p><p><a href="http://ixbtlabs.com/articles2/creative-emu-1820/">http://ixbtlabs.com/articles2/creative-emu-1820/</a></p><p>It nearly broke the bank, but it is nice.</p><p>Glenn</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Glenn NK]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=750</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-01-22T18:29:36Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=9238#p9238</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Latency of 1.5ms with buffer size of 64]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=9217#p9217"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Glenn NK wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Which one.</p><p><a href="http://www.emu.com/products/welcome.asp?category=610&amp;">http://www.emu.com/products/welcome.asp...y=610&amp;</a></p><p>Glenn</p></blockquote></div><p>Xmidi 1x1</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[sigasa]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=399</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-01-22T10:25:47Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=9217#p9217</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Latency of 1.5ms with buffer size of 64]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=9210#p9210"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Which one.</p><p><a href="http://www.emu.com/products/welcome.asp?category=610&amp;">http://www.emu.com/products/welcome.asp...y=610&amp;</a></p><p>Glenn</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Glenn NK]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=750</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-01-21T23:33:19Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=9210#p9210</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Latency of 1.5ms with buffer size of 64]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=9209#p9209"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Glenn NK wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Good news Christopher.</p><p>I&#039;m using the EMU 1820M (five years now), but it&#039;s a PCI.</p><p>Surprising that you can get latency that low through USB.</p><p>Which unit is that?&nbsp; 0404 USB 2.0 or the 0202?</p><p>Glenn</p></blockquote></div><p>its a midi to usb cable (e-mu Xmidi)</p><p>Chris</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[sigasa]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=399</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-01-21T22:54:46Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=9209#p9209</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Latency of 1.5ms with buffer size of 64]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=9206#p9206"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Note that the latency reported by Pianoteq, or perhaps your ASIO control panel, is only the latency due to the ASIO buffer itself. There may be extra latency.</p><p>In my case, with my Fast Track Ultra in standard mode, there is a 110 sample overhead. I.e, if my buffer size is set to 128, I need to add 110 to that to get my REAL latency, which is 238 samples.</p><p>Sequencers seem to be able to report the true latency, which makes me think that the ASIO software interface has the capability to report this to applications.&nbsp; I have tried two - Ableton Live, and Samplitude - both report 5.4ms for the output latency @128samples &amp; 44.1kHz, whereas&nbsp; Pianoteq only reports the raw ASIO buffer latency (2.9ms)&nbsp; (Samplitude reports the latency very precisely: 238 samples - Ableton just gives the time in milliseconds)</p><p>Also, I suspect that the actual latency would vary a bit from note to note, depending on the precise time the note was struck, in relation to the timing of the audio streaming process.</p><p>The above is ignoring MIDI latency, of course.</p><p>Greg.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[skip]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=353</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-01-21T22:46:17Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=9206#p9206</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Latency of 1.5ms with buffer size of 64]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=9205#p9205"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Good news Christopher.</p><p>I&#039;m using the EMU 1820M (five years now), but it&#039;s a PCI.</p><p>Surprising that you can get latency that low through USB.</p><p>Which unit is that?&nbsp; 0404 USB 2.0 or the 0202?</p><p>Glenn</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Glenn NK]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=750</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-01-21T22:42:33Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=9205#p9205</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Latency of 1.5ms with buffer size of 64]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=9204#p9204"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I have just found that I can acheive much lower latencies than I had been by switching to asio4all and using my emu Xmidi USB interface. I had been using a standard midi cable to connect my keyboard to my focusrite saffire pro 24 firewire audio interface, but I was never really satisfied with the latencies I was getting. I don&#039;t know if it was the cables or the midi interface within the focusrite that was causing this, but, as I say, I&#039;m getting 1.5ms which is heaps better than 4.0! By the way, the sample rate is set at 48000 / 32000 and there are no glitches. I haven&#039;t had the chance to really try it out properly, but so far so good. In addition, I must note that I disabled all my USB ports bar the one my emu Xmidi is plugged into.</p><p>hope this helps someone <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[sigasa]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=399</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-01-21T22:36:08Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=9204#p9204</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
