<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Just install on new pc, but windows audio low latency only offers 10ms]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=10560&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2023-05-27T14:07:54Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=10560</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Just install on new pc, but windows audio low latency only offers 10ms]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=990494#p990494"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I already have a Fiio K3 dac, which offers zero detectable latency via its ASIO</p><p>However, have worked it out</p><p><a href="https://neosmart.net/wiki/fix-realtek-audio-delay-lag/">https://neosmart.net/wiki/fix-realtek-audio-delay-lag/</a></p><p>Did that, rebooted, now I get all the audio buffer size options, can set to 128 samples.</p><p>So it was the realtek audio driver at fault.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Fancellu]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8752</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-05-27T14:07:54Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=990494#p990494</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Just install on new pc, but windows audio low latency only offers 10ms]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=990490#p990490"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It might related with Audio output setting. Let me tell you my case. I have DELL U2415 monitor which has an audio out port and my pc speaker is connected to it. When I set Windows Audio (Low Latency Mode) as Audio device type and set DELL U2415 as Audio output, then I get fixed buffer size as same as you. When I change the audio output to High Definition Audio Device (motherboard built-in audio), I can get 128-480 buffer sizes. My pc is i7-9700 and Windows 11.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Snowpine]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5829</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-05-27T10:40:34Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=990490#p990490</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Just install on new pc, but windows audio low latency only offers 10ms]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=990488#p990488"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Great link: &quot;Glitch Free&quot;, thanks a lot !</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>Qexl wrote:</cite><blockquote><p><a href="https://www.cantabilesoftware.com/glitchfree/">Glitch Free is a guide for getting better audio results - by Brad from Cantabile - Software for Performing Musicians</a></p></blockquote></div>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Luc Henrion]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=6</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-05-27T09:35:53Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=990488#p990488</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Just install on new pc, but windows audio low latency only offers 10ms]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=990487#p990487"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Yes, unfortunately different computer builds can have differing overall audio latency loop measurements, esp. when using their internal sound card. </p><p>Agree with jcitron, an external audio device is certainly worth considering. Not just for lower latency (in it&#039;s portion of the whole audio latency loop) - but also, it may include benefits like better &#039;headroom&#039;, better DAC and various other things, giving better overall sound too. To make it more useful, it also will handle a lot of processing which will give your PCs CPU some extra room to process things (background processes etc.) better with fewer glitches/limitations, while getting on with piano/recording/playback. </p><p>BTW I had a previous laptop (similar vintage) which had a slightly faster internal audio latency loop than my current higher spec PC tower. I built the new one for speed/power etc.. but it&#039;s like yours, slower internally then my old lappy. </p><p>The benefit though, of a good external audio unit (connected over a fast USB 3 in my case) is that, it can run smaller buffer sizes etc.. and ends up shortening the entire latency loop - faster overall than the old machine could get. But for piano playing, I like some latency depending on the piece.. so getting quite a lot closer to zero latency (in Pianoteq&#039;s numbers) for piano is to me not a reason to get lower and lower latency.. but it&#039;s possible if it is your goal. </p><br /><p>Adding these for OP and/or any readers passing thru, as they are useful for doing other things to get a workstation humming along better: </p><br /><p>First thing maybe to check: </p><p><a href="https://asio4all.org/">ASIO4all - Universal Windows ASIO Driver</a> </p><p>(or ASIO drivers at all.. just to be sure you&#039;re not struggling without at least ASIO first.) Or maybe your sound card supplies an ASIO driver bundle to install. I&#039;m almost certain Fancellu does/did.. but putting this here for any readers because, I&#039;ve found many have overlooked this bit, and find their soundcard stuttering etc.</p><br /><p>Some other very basic things to look for include, removing unnecessary apps (or stopping them from &#039;startup&#039;), esp. apps which use audio in some way.. and certainly turn off or remove &#039;helper&#039; apps which may do things like 3D audio, or some spatializing (different names like &#039;theatrical mode&#039; audio.. some are like bloatware which often comes installed by default but much of it can be removed and it can help you get on top of your own audio).</p><br /><p>This is my recommended guide for checking though &quot;What have I missed?&quot; to get audio working as well as can be expected on our machines (it&#039;s a free and I believe very helpful resource which has been around a while and seems updated over time)..</p><p><a href="https://www.cantabilesoftware.com/glitchfree/">Glitch Free is a guide for getting better audio results - by Brad from Cantabile - Software for Performing Musicians</a></p><br /><p>Hoping some of that helps OP or others getting better performance - but certainly, I&#039;d recommend an external audio unit for many reasons beyond latency.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Qexl]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=4633</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-05-27T07:02:14Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=990487#p990487</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Just install on new pc, but windows audio low latency only offers 10ms]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=990486#p990486"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Fancellu wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>New pc is win11, amd 7950x</p><p>i.e. audio buffer is 480 samples (10ms) @48k hz</p><p>On my old pc (i7-3820 from 2013!) it offers from 128-448 samples (2.7ms to 9.3ms)</p><p>Any idea why?</p></blockquote></div><p>Is this built in audio?</p><p>This can be really poor depending upon the hardware. You may want to invest in a discrete sound card as that will give you more options and better sound.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[jcitron]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=6888</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-05-27T04:45:50Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=990486#p990486</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Just install on new pc, but windows audio low latency only offers 10ms]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=990482#p990482"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>New pc is win11, amd 7950x</p><p>i.e. audio buffer is 480 samples (10ms) @48k hz</p><p>On my old pc (i7-3820 from 2013!) it offers from 128-448 samples (2.7ms to 9.3ms)</p><p>Any idea why?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Fancellu]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8752</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-05-26T19:28:52Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=990482#p990482</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
