<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - What do the "Felt" models have that the others don't?]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=10434&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2023-04-18T02:45:19Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=10434</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: What do the "Felt" models have that the others don't?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=989529#p989529"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The main thing the &#039;Felt&#039; presets have is some extra care and time put into balancing out all aspects of they way the felt makes the model sound. </p><p>(Oh, obviously I&#039;m not saying &#039;just more time overall&#039; but just some specific time put into zeroing in on, and balancing things inre felt). </p><p>While any preset can indeed be quickly made &#039;like&#039; a felt preset, it will likely be a little different, which is for sure OK (not saying worse etc.. could be excellent and the way you like it - try it for sure) - but having pre-made &#039;felt&#039; presets means users do not need to fuss so much in trying to create the well loved effect. I think Pianoteq felt presets are wonderfully rich and maintain realism. </p><p>Within the felt variants, &#039;felt II&#039; variants go a little further towards pushing certain characteristics harder than &#039;Felt I&#039; variants. </p><p>The felt models are hitched to an inescapable realism set by the piano itself, which means they are not all just identical - so it&#039;s a great pallet available here to have among all pianos. </p><p>The U4 upright &#039;Felt II&#039; preset (my fav of the felt presets) dances even a little further beyond realism, towards other famous felt pianos on the market which also include more up-close mics and cinematic compression with more noise evident. I find it quite the fit for cinematic felt piano moods. It&#039;s easy to overlook the U4 among all the wonderful pianos - but it&#039;s versatile and I just love being able to dial in character of any kind as it becomes more balanced over time generally. </p><p>Whilst the notion of &#039;felt piano&#039; is a near recent music production craze with some progenitors (in a way worthy of some righteous and joyous market buzz), actual felt pianos in reality have been around for a century or more. There are some interesting old instruments with all kinds of ways of introducing felt to the strings - but for sure, Pianoteq gives options here too. </p><p>Esp.. by applying Celeste pedal (felt) and using &#039;pinch harmonic&#039; (tweaking these like applying felt somewhere further down the strings, subtly to get that superb and magical sound.. there&#039;s a horizon somewhere - see you when you get back <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Qexl]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=4633</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-04-18T02:45:19Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=989529#p989529</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: What do the "Felt" models have that the others don't?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=989522#p989522"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>You can isolate the felt variable with the celeste pedal. If you pull up a felt preset and depress the celeste pedal, it&#039;ll remove the felt (or vice versa with a non-felted preset). I always keep an expression pedal mapped to celeste, it makes for some expressive performance options you can&#039;t get with sample libraries.</p><p>I notice some mechanical noises when the felt kicks in that don&#039;t seem to be there without it, almost like a muffled key release knock. If that&#039;s part of the sound you&#039;re noticing, then standard and pro let you adjust key release noise, might be worth playing with that.</p><p>You may be aware of this already, but you can also play around with the condition parameter to introduce more imperfections like you might hear on a real piano. And of course dial in your velocity curve, and EQ can make a huge difference.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[miiindbullets]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8367</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-04-17T22:05:37Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=989522#p989522</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[What do the "Felt" models have that the others don't?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=989500#p989500"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve been wanting Pianoteq to sound real, just like literally everyone else that purchased Pianoteq. I&#039;ve noticed that my Steinway Model D Felt presets sound really good, and when I switch back to a non-felt preset, I notice the bad &quot;plastic&quot; sound. Is there something in the preset that I have to add to get that nice full sound?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Alex_Fullam]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8756</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-04-16T22:37:13Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=989500#p989500</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
