<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Adjust resonances and other features without getting crazy]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=10344&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2023-03-24T21:24:56Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=10344</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Adjust resonances and other features without getting crazy]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=988943#p988943"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>davidizquierdo82 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I also end up using the presets in Pianoteq more than anything else but I&#039;d still like to be able to use a single preset (say the &quot;K2 Basic&quot;) and then to be able to change its character like &quot;light resonance&quot;, &quot;deep resonance&quot;, &quot;classical&quot;, &quot;dark&quot;, &quot;soft&quot;, &quot;rich&quot; etc.. those settings would be available for all piano models regardless of their current presets which BTW aren&#039;t always the same from one piano to another.</p><p>Not a big deal after all but my 2ct in case Modartt reads.</p></blockquote></div><p>I see. I think that is much more complicated than what I suggested (which is &quot;piece of cake&quot; for Modartt to implement, if they deem it useful and find the time).<br />I agree with you it&#039;d be a nice addition to have</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dv]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8109</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-03-24T21:24:56Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=988943#p988943</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Adjust resonances and other features without getting crazy]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=988937#p988937"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>dv wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>davidizquierdo82 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>As a side note, I think Modartt did such a great job giving users the possibility to edit sounds in a million ways but I wonder why they didn&#039;t make it easier instead like when editing sounds on DP&#039;s, there could be a &quot;standard user&quot; mode with some more simplified options and ranges that keep the sound realistic besides a &quot;pro&quot; mode with the current options where you can easily get unrealistic sounds depending on the used values/ranges..</p></blockquote></div><p>I agree with you. In my experimentations, I have found that reducing oneself to EXTREMELY small changes of values is best. At first one (=myself) thinks that such small changes are unnoticeable, but they instead are when doing A/B comparison of playing the piano (or listening to MIDI recordings).</p><p>One other problem is that changing one thing often requires changing another, and it&#039;s sometimes mysterious what that other thing is.<br />It would be extremely useful to have the tooltips (or perhaps even dialog boxes) suggesting things like &quot;Ah you changed X raising it by x% -- for best results, consider changing Y by lowering in the range y0-y1%).</p><p>That said, you also wrote:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>davidizquierdo82 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>It even has some presets ready to be used by a single click</p></blockquote></div><p>In fact Pianoteq has gazillions of presets, and most of the time I just use them (even if I have pro...) rather than trying to make my own.</p></blockquote></div><p>I also end up using the presets in Pianoteq more than anything else but I&#039;d still like to be able to use a single preset (say the &quot;K2 Basic&quot;) and then to be able to change its character like &quot;light resonance&quot;, &quot;deep resonance&quot;, &quot;classical&quot;, &quot;dark&quot;, &quot;soft&quot;, &quot;rich&quot; etc.. those settings would be available for all piano models regardless of their current presets which BTW aren&#039;t always the same from one piano to another.</p><p>In this case I wouldn&#039;t need to pick the &quot;K2 Concert Record AB&quot; from PTQ presets and then revert the MIC&#039;s and other features like reverb etc to what they are on the &quot;K2 Basic&quot; so I get the rather &quot;classical&quot; settings but using the &quot;standard&quot; K2 patch, not sure I explained it well..</p><p>Not a big deal after all but my 2ct in case Modartt reads.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[davidizquierdo82]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=4401</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-03-24T17:29:39Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=988937#p988937</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Adjust resonances and other features without getting crazy]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=988932#p988932"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>davidizquierdo82 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>As a side note, I think Modartt did such a great job giving users the possibility to edit sounds in a million ways but I wonder why they didn&#039;t make it easier instead like when editing sounds on DP&#039;s, there could be a &quot;standard user&quot; mode with some more simplified options and ranges that keep the sound realistic besides a &quot;pro&quot; mode with the current options where you can easily get unrealistic sounds depending on the used values/ranges..</p></blockquote></div><p>I agree with you. In my experimentations, I have found that reducing oneself to EXTREMELY small changes of values is best. At first one (=myself) thinks that such small changes are unnoticeable, but they instead are when doing A/B comparison of playing the piano (or listening to MIDI recordings).</p><p>One other problem is that changing one thing often requires changing another, and it&#039;s sometimes mysterious what that other thing is.<br />It would be extremely useful to have the tooltips (or perhaps even dialog boxes) suggesting things like &quot;Ah you changed X raising it by x% -- for best results, consider changing Y by lowering in the range y0-y1%).</p><p>That said, you also wrote:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>davidizquierdo82 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>It even has some presets ready to be used by a single click</p></blockquote></div><p>In fact Pianoteq has gazillions of presets, and most of the time I just use them (even if I have pro...) rather than trying to make my own.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dv]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8109</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-03-24T15:44:21Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=988932#p988932</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Adjust resonances and other features without getting crazy]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=988927#p988927"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I have a Kawai CA97 which I like much its sound. I especially like that it&#039;s got a &quot;virtual technician&quot; to adjust this sound to your liking depending on the mood/situation (19 parameters I guess).</p><p>I find this &quot;virtual technician&quot; very easy to manipulate (similar to what Roland also has in their DP), a couple of clicks here and there and you&#039;re getting a totally different lovely sound. It even has some presets ready to be used by a single click, I happen to like one of these called &quot;deep resonance&quot; which brings up a lot of nuance and richness to the sound.</p><p>I&#039;m trying to ger a similar result with Pianoteq but I&#039;m not able to manipulate the several resonance settings without ending up getting an awkward kind of sound, sometimes like there&#039;s a &quot;chorus&quot; effect instead of duplex resonance, some other times feeling like resonances in the higher register sound more offending that they should etc.</p><p>I&#039;ve tried to play with the main EQ, the length of the resonances, and even eq-ing the resonances (2nd option within the EQ tabs). Also, played with the sympathetic resonance and duplex scale sliders etc but no way I can get a satisfying result.</p><p>I&#039;m not expecting a piano sound with same character as the ones on my CA97, I just want the same type/degree of artifacts involved in this sound, if anyone can help me with this.</p><p>As a side note, I think Modartt did such a great job giving users the possibility to edit sounds in a million ways but I wonder why they didn&#039;t make it easier instead like when editing sounds on DP&#039;s, there could be a &quot;standard user&quot; mode with some more simplified options and ranges that keep the sound realistic besides a &quot;pro&quot; mode with the current options where you can easily get unrealistic sounds depending on the used values/ranges..</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[davidizquierdo82]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=4401</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-03-24T14:30:46Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=988927#p988927</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
